Construct 5: Reasoning

Definition

The construct of reasoning measures an individual’s ability to recognize novel patterns and the conceptual relationship among objects and effectively apply these patterns to solve similar problems.

References

Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1986). Can decline in adult intellectual functioning be reversed? Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.223
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz, Turiano, Nicholas A., Willis, Sherry L., Schaie, K. Warner (2007). Effects of Cognitive Training on Change in Accuracy in Inductive Reasoning Ability Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62B (3), 179-186.

5.20 Raven’s Matrices

Description (task duration: 15 minutes):

  • Participants are presented with a set of geometric patterns that have a sequential structure with one piece missing. At the same time, they are also presented with an array of 6 or 8 geometric shape options. Participants must determine which pattern out of these 6 or 8 options is required to complete the visual pattern set.
  • • The problems are divided into 4 blocks. In the first two blocks, subjects chose the correct pattern out of 6 options; in the last two blocks, subjects choose the correct pattern out of 8 options. Within a block, problems are arranged by increasing difficulty, with problems 1 and 2 being the easiest, problems 3 and 4 being moderately difficult, and problems 5 and 6 the most difficult.
  • Participants are given 15 minutes to complete 24 problems. We note that this is a modification of the original Raven’s Matrices, which has a larger pattern set.
Primary Reference:

Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998a). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 1: General Overview. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.

5.21 ETS Letter Sets

Description (task duration: 14 minutes):

  • Subjects are presented with 5 sets of letters; each set is made up of 4 letters. 3 of the sets of letters are alike in some way, while the fourth set of letters does not follow the same rule. Subjects are asked to determine which set of letters does not follow the same rule as the other 3 sets of letters. Subjects are instructed to mark a line through the set of letters that does not follow the same rule as the other 3 sets of letters.
  • Participants have a total of 14 minutes to complete 30 problems.  The task is presented in 2 parts each part lasting 7 minutes with 15 problems to complete.
  • Higher scores indicate better reasoning ability.
Primary Reference:

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

5.22 CANTAB Stockings of Cambridge

Description (task duration: approximately 15 minutes):

  • Stockings of Cambridge is a computerized version of Tower of London (Shallice 1982) in which participants are shown a split screen with two displays each containing three colored balls.
  • Task Phase: The balls are arranged in such a way that they look like they are stacked in stockings hanging from a beam. Participants must move the balls in the bottom arrangement one at a time in order to match the top arrangement in as few moves as possible.
  • Motor Phase: The balls are arranged in the same way as in the task phase, but now the top arrangement and the bottom arrangement begin identical. The computer will automatically move a ball in the top arrangement. The participant should copy the same movement on the bottom arrangement, moving the same-colored ball to the same position the computer moved the ball in the top arrangement.
  • Practice Phase: Subjects are given 8 1 or 2-move practice problems, which are not included in the overall score.
  • Stockings of Cambridge is completed in 4 blocks. It starts with the task phase, which is followed by the motor phase. This sequence is then repeated with a slight increase in difficulty. In the first task phase subjects see 2, 3 and 4-move problems twice each. In the second task phase subjects see 4-move problems twice, and 5-move problems four times. There is a total of 12 scored items.
Primary Reference:

Robbins, T.W., James, M., Owen, A.M., Sahakian, B.J., McInnes, L., Rabbitt, P. (1994). Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): A factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia, 5, 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1159/000106735

Software Reference:

CANTAB Eclipse (2007) http://www.cambridgecognition.com/academic/cantabsuite/tests

5.23 Everyday Problem Solving

Description (task duration: approximately 30 minutes):

  • Participants are asked to read things taken from things people think are important, such as labels, credit applications and bus schedules, and answer questions based on them.
  • This test has 42 questions and is not timed.
Primary Reference:

Willis, S. L., & Marsiske, M. (1993). Manual for the everyday problems test. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.

Reasoning Construct: Key to Names and Data Structure in Data Set

Item NameAbbreviationDescription Measurement
Subject NumberS#Subject identifier 
Age IntervalAgeIntervalAge at wave recoded into 3-year intervals20-100
SexSexParticipant’s biological sex.m = Male
f = Female
RaceRaceRace that the participant self-identifies with.1 = Asian American/ Pacific Islander
2 = Black/African American
3 = Multiracial
4 = Native American
5 = White/Caucasian
6 = Other
7 = Unknown
EthnicityEthnicityEthnicity that the participant self-identifies with.1=Hispanic/Latin(o/a)
0 = Non-Hispanic
Handedness ScoreHandednessScoreAverage score of participant hand preference while completing various tasks. Higher scores indicate preference for the right hand.Score range: 0-4  
0 = Always left
1 = Usually left
2 = No preference
3 = Usually right
4 = Always right
Mini-Mental State Exam TotalMMSETotal # of items answered correctly.Score range: 0-30
Cognitive Battery Wave 1-2 IntervalCogW1toW2Interval between cognitive testing day 1 for waves 1-2.# of Years
Cognitive Battery Wave 2-3 IntervalCogW2toW3Interval between cognitive testing day 1 for waves 2-3.# of Years
Cognitive Battery Wave 1-3 IntervalCogW1toW3Interval between cognitive testing day 1 for waves 1-3.# of Years
Take Home Wave 1-2 IntervalTakeHomeW1toW2Interval between Take Home for waves 1-2.# of Years
Take Home Wave 2-3 IntervalTakeHomeW2toW3Interval between Take Home for waves 2-3.# of Years
Take Home Wave 1-3 IntervalTakeHomeW1toW3Interval between Take Home for waves 1-3.# of Years
MRI Wave 1-2 IntervalMRIW1toW2Interval between MRI scan for waves 1-2.# of Years
MRI Wave 2-3 IntervalMRIW2toW3Interval between MRI scan for waves 2-3.# of Years
MRI Wave 1-3 IntervalMRIW1toW3Interval between MRI scan for waves 1-3.# of Years
Amyloid PET Wave 1-2 IntervalPETAmyW1toW2Interval between amyloid PET scan for waves 1-2.# of Years
Amyloid PET Wave 2-3 IntervalPETAmyW2toW3Interval between amyloid PET scan for waves 2-3.# of Years
Amyloid PET Wave 1-3 IntervalPETAmyW1toW3Interval between amyloid PET scan for waves 1-3.# of Years
Highest Level of Education CompletedEduComp5This is an ordinal measure of participants’ self-reported highest level of education completed. 1 = Less than high school graduate 
2 = High school graduate/GED 
3 = Some college/trade/ technical/business school 
4 = Bachelor’s degree 
5 = Some graduate work 
6 = Master’s degree 
7 = MD/JD/PhD/other advanced degree 
Education Estimated Years CappedEduYrsEstCap5This is a conversion of the participant’s self-reported highest level of education into a capped estimated number of years it would take to reach this highest level of education.   The “capped” comes into play when someone spend a longer time than usual for a certain degree but did not complete it. In short, someone with a lot of years of education but did not complete a degree will not score higher than someone who did complete the degree. 11 maximum = Less than High school
12 = High School
15 maximum = Some College
16 = Bachelor’s degree
20 maximum = Some Graduate Work
18 = Master’s degree
21 = MD/JD/PhD/ Advanced degree  
Construct NameConstructNameReasoning 
Construct NumberConstructNumberConstruct 5 
WaveWaveDenotes the data collection wave. See individual differences data set for more detail, including testing date intervals.1 = Wave 1
2 = Wave 2
3 = Wave 3
Has DataHasData1 = Yes, returned for wave; 2 = No, did not return for wave 
Number of Tasks in ConstructNumTasksHow many tasks make up the reasoning construct4 Tasks for Reasoning
Task 20—Ravens MatricesTask20 (column: AA)1 = Has data 2 = Task data partial 3 = No task data 
Ravens Accuracy EasyRavenAccE20Total number of correct items for first 18 Easy problems divided by 18Score Range: 0-1
Ravens Accuracy MediumRavenAccM20Total number of correct items for first 18 Medium problems divided by 18Score Range: 0-1
Ravens Accuracy HardRavenAccH20Total number of correct items for first 18 Hard problems divided by 18Score Range: 0-1
Ravens Accuracy All  RavenAccAll20Total number of correct items for all 24 problems divided by 24Score Range: 0-1
Ravens Number CorrectRavenNumCor20Number of correct responses for all 24 problemsScore Range: 0-24
Ravens TimeRavenTime20Time subjects needed to complete the task0-15 minutes
Ravens Number AnsweredRavenNumAnswer20Number of problems answered in 15 minutesScore Range: 0-24
Task 21—ETS Letter SetsTask21 (column: AI)1 = Has data 2 = Task data partial 3 = No task data 
ETS Letter Sets Part 1  EtsLsP1_21Total number of correct items for the first 15 SetsScore Range: 0-15
ETS Letter Sets Part 2EtsLsP2_21Total number of correct items for the last 15 SetsScore Range: 0-15
ETS Letter Sets TotalEtsLsTOTAL21Total number of correct items for the whole task.Score Range: 0-30
Task 22—Cantab Stockings of CambridgeTask22 (column: AM)1 = Has data 2 = Task data partial 3 = No task data 
Cantab Stocking of Cambridge – Number of Problems solved in Minimum MovesCantabSOCMinMov22    The number of times upon which the subject has successfully completed a test problem in the minimum possible number of moves.Score Range: 0-12
Cantab Stocking of Cambridge – Mean 2-move problemsCantabSOCMeanMove2_22The average number of moves the subject made for 2-move problems 
Cantab Stocking of Cambridge -Mean 3-move problemsCantabSOCMeanMove3_22The average number of moves the subject made for 3-move problems 
Cantab Stocking of Cambridge – Mean 4-move problemsCantabSOCMeanMove4_22The average number of moves the subject made for 4-move problems 
Cantab Stocking of Cambridge – Mean 5-move problemsCantabSOCMeanMove5_22The average number of moves the subject made for 5-move problems 
Cantab Stocking of CambridgeCantabSOCIntialTime2_22Average initial thinking time is the difference in time taken to select the first ball for the same 2-move problems in the task phase vs. the motor phase. 
Cantab Stocking of CambridgeCantabSOCIntialTime3_22Average initial thinking time is the difference in time taken to select the first ball for the same 3-move problems in the task phase vs. the motor phase. 
Cantab Stocking of CambridgeCantabSOCIntialTime4_22Average initial thinking time is the difference in time taken to select the first ball for the same 4-move problems in the task phase vs. the motor phase. 
Cantab Stocking of CambridgeCantabSOCIntialTime5_22Average initial thinking time is the difference in time taken to select the first ball for the same 5-move problems in the task phase vs. the motor phase. 
Cantab Stocking of CambridgeCantabSOCSubsequentTime2_22The average difference in time between selecting the first ball and completing the 2-move problem for the task vs. motor phase, and then dividing this result by the number of moves made.